Man is a social animal. It is such an animal, which has a social instinct also. A human being is much more seperat than the other fellow animals, very particularly, the way of living. Where the difference lies and why it is such? In fact 'the society' is responsible for it.Therefore 'the society' can not denay the responcibility of it's outcome. MY EMAIL ID arupkumargupta@gmail.com; MOB-9893058429.

Tuesday 13 December 2011

In regard to judge's accountability bill

Abuse of the process of judgment should be triggered but there is no symptom of it, in the bill.

How a judgment originated?

(i) Petitioner complains; (2) Respondent's reply on it; (3) Evidences and (4) Witnesses comes through the parties. After considering the above four material, final decision given by the judge as a prudent man,- that is judgment.

If the judge does not work as a prudent man, then doubt raise from that point. What restricts the judge to work as a prudent man? The first and foremost consideration comes to a prudent man's mind is bribe. It is always not that. Sometimes some other reason may work but the main point still remains as it is. 'Why the judge deviated to work as a prudent man?'

There are two points. One is whether the judge deviated to work as a prudent person? Another is how it will be ensured that a party gets 'just' under the above circumstances?

Judges of lower court do not come under the said bill. What is the guarantee that HC, SC will not repeat the same thing?

Judges accountability related with judgment they delivered and not of their property. Earning illegally is a hatred thing not only for a judge but for all.
Powered By Blogger

Followers