S.Sabarinadh, Student - There is a common saying in many of the lower classes of constitution that " Our constitution is the lengthiest written and the best constitution in the world " Still we finds the appaling reality that the constitution which is spilled out of loop holes which makes it the worst and the most amended. i was just reminding the real face of the constitution which is a complete recipe of ambiguity and confusions in my opinion if you need to get the right scope of any article without considering any of the precedence you must have a big book on Interpretation of Statutes and Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on your right side. It is a constitution in which the first clause says "you can do an act" and second clause says that" If it is rain you are not allowed to do that"....Now the truth is that it is always rain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Altogether we have imparted a lot from various constitution but the made mixture is somewhat like petrol diesel mix ...............
Gagan Gupta, Advocate - There is no need of vast details of the funcationality of organs of State in any Constitution. No need to mention age of judges or there numers and place of sitting in it, TSo many unnecessary details made it complex and voluminous which itself is disadvantage leading to confusion. The details which could be filled by framing rules or enacting Acts should not be in the Constitution. It should mention organs of state( 3 essential and others), FR's, Inter state relations etc.
Self- i support mr gagan gupta's view. from panchyet to president everything is entired into constitution. seperate rules also are there on the same matter. “in my opinion if you need to get the right scope of any article without considering any of the precedence you must have a big book on Interpretation of Statutes and Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on your right side. It is a constitution in which the first clause says "you can do an act" and second clause says that" If it is rain you are not allowed to do that"....Now the truth is that it is always rain “ FANTASTIC EXPRESSION. A SIMPLE STUDENT CAN NOT EXPRESS IN THIS MANNER.
Posted by Arup Kumar Gupta
Gagan Gupta, Advocate - There is no need of vast details of the funcationality of organs of State in any Constitution. No need to mention age of judges or there numers and place of sitting in it, TSo many unnecessary details made it complex and voluminous which itself is disadvantage leading to confusion. The details which could be filled by framing rules or enacting Acts should not be in the Constitution. It should mention organs of state( 3 essential and others), FR's, Inter state relations etc.
Self- i support mr gagan gupta's view. from panchyet to president everything is entired into constitution. seperate rules also are there on the same matter. “in my opinion if you need to get the right scope of any article without considering any of the precedence you must have a big book on Interpretation of Statutes and Dr. B. R. Ambedkar on your right side. It is a constitution in which the first clause says "you can do an act" and second clause says that" If it is rain you are not allowed to do that"....Now the truth is that it is always rain “ FANTASTIC EXPRESSION. A SIMPLE STUDENT CAN NOT EXPRESS IN THIS MANNER.
Posted by Arup Kumar Gupta
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment